| What it measures |
Resistance of an intact specimen to being pulled until it breaks. |
Resistance associated with initiating or propagating a tear after local damage or a defined cut. |
They answer different failure questions. Do not replace one with the other. |
| Typical loading |
Distributed pulling load across a strip or grab specimen. |
Highly concentrated stress at a tear tip or split specimen. |
Broad tension and local damage must both be considered for reusable tarps. |
| Direction |
Usually reported MD/warp and CD/weft. |
Also directional; the notation must be defined by the supplier or laboratory. |
Compare both directions, not only the higher number. |
| Common reporting |
N, N/5 cm, lbf or another method-defined format. |
Often N or another method-defined force result; some legacy data sheets use different units and conventions. |
Never normalize different methods or specimen widths by assumption. |
| Strongly influenced by |
Yarn tenacity, denier, thread density, weave, specimen width, coating interaction and test method. |
Yarn mobility, weave, coating bond, cut geometry, fabric density, yarn strength and tear method. |
The full construction matters more than one GSM headline. |
| Real-world relevance |
Large covers, tensioned panels, truck curtains, tent skins, frame-supported covers and general load carrying. |
Sharp cargo contact, damaged edges, flapping, grommet zones, corners, punctures and repeated handling. |
Use the application’s most likely failure mode to set minimums. |
| Common buyer mistake |
Assuming a high tensile number guarantees resistance to cuts or grommet-area failure. |
Assuming a high tear number proves the whole panel can carry high sustained tension. |
A balanced specification usually needs both. |