| Failure condition |
An intact strip or grabbed area is pulled until rupture. |
A cut or shaped specimen is loaded so a tear starts or continues. |
The values model different field failures and should not substitute for one another. |
| Main application question |
Can the sheet carry the expected distributed load? |
Can the sheet slow the spread of local damage? |
Large tensioned covers usually need high tensile capacity; sharp or abrasive environments also need strong tear behaviour. |
| Typical reporting |
Common formats include N/5 cm, N/50 mm, lbf/in or a force value tied to specimen width. |
Common formats include N or lbf, depending on tongue, trapezoid, pendulum or another method. |
Units alone are not enough. Confirm specimen width, geometry and test procedure. |
| Directional data |
Usually reported in warp/MD and weft/CD directions. |
Also directional; the tear path and cut orientation must be defined. |
Use the lower relevant directional value where load orientation is uncertain. |
| Primary material drivers |
Yarn tenacity, denier, weave density, yarn count, coating bond and fabric balance. |
Yarn strength, yarn mobility, weave architecture, coating stiffness, slit geometry and local stress concentration. |
A heavier or denser fabric may improve some properties without increasing every property proportionally. |
| Finished tarp weak points |
Seams, narrow necks, folds, attachment lines and areas with uneven pre-tension. |
Cut edges, punctures, grommet holes, corners, cargo contact points and abrasion damage. |
Material data should be paired with seam, hem and hardware design. |
| Best use in supplier comparison |
Screen material load capacity and dimensional reserve. |
Screen damage tolerance and rip-propagation reserve. |
Compare matched test reports or identified samples—not isolated catalogue numbers. |